Horgan and Johnson have a neat
dialogue, as usual, over at Blogging Heads.tv. Horgan notes the Tetlock's book documented that experts did worse than chance at predicting major events, relative to a naive alternative (discussed in this good New Yorker
here). The idea is that experts are incented to create
innovative theories, and the more they know, they better they become at defending, and cherry picking the evidence to support it.
No comments:
Post a Comment